Claude Code performs unauthorized code modifications
🧭 workproduct problemSingle report ●●●●●
The author reports that Claude Code exhibits 'scope creep' by modifying files or adding code that was not requested in the original prompt, leading to codebase bloat and potential security risks.
What people do today
- Manual code review of all AI-generated diffs
- Rolling back changes via Git
- Writing highly specific, restrictive prompts
🔧 Fix this
Ideas a builder, maker or community group could start on:
- A standardized 'scope-lock' protocol that AI agents must adhere to, requiring explicit file-access permissions before editing.
- A browser or IDE extension that visualizes AI-proposed changes in a sandbox environment before they are applied to the local file system.
- A policy-based framework for AI coding tools that forces agents to output a 'plan' for user approval before executing any file modifications.
Real voices
“suddenly it s refactoring your entire config file or adding unrelated imports. This isn t just annoying - it s scope creep”
Related problems
🧭 workproduct8 reports
LinkedIn feed quality and fake job listings
🧭 workproduct6 reportsLinkedIn account access and stability issues
🧭 workproduct4 reportsIndeed job feed ignores user preferences
FixHumanityDaily
The most important new problems, and ideas to fix them, in your inbox.
Placeholder: no data is collected yet.